News

Andy Coulson: “Do his phone” not an instruction to hack a phone

16/04/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Andy Coulson's instruction "Do his phone" was not an instruction to hack a phone, he told the Old Bailey today.

The former tabloid editor said that instead he was requesting a check of a reporter's phone data to see if he was leaking the News of the World's stories to rivals.

Mr Coulson sent the instruction on 20 May 2006 during an email conversation with a senior NoW journalist about a forthcoming exclusive on Calum Best, a two-time contestant on Celebrity Love Island and the son of footballer George Best.

Mr Coulson wrote: "You think Calum a leak?", to which the executive replied that Mr Best was "bragging I have close mates inside NoW".

Asked what he had meant by his subsequent email response, Mr Coulson told the court: "I was in no doubt that this was not an instruction to hack anybody's phone."

I remember what this was because it was Rav [Singh] and he was a friend of mine and I remembering authorising the request for billing data for Rav."

Ultimately, Mr Coulson told the court: "No evidence was ever put in front of me that Rav was definitively leaking stories."

The court has previously been told the News of the World's managing editor, Stuart Kuttner, received a copy of Mr Singh's billing data nine days earlier, on 11 May 2006.

Mr Coulson told the court that by sending his "Do his phone" email he was "re-emphasising" that earlier request.

He, Mr Kuttner and fellow former NoW editor Rebekah Brooks deny conspiring to hack phones. The case will resume on Tuesday, when Mr Coulson continues his evidence.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News