News

Andy Coulson: “Do his phone” not an instruction to hack a phone

16/04/2014

By Martin HickmanAndy Coulson's instruction "Do his phone" was not an instruction to hack a phone, he told the Old Bailey today.The former tabloid editor said that instead he was requesting a check of a reporter's phone data to see if he was leaking the News of the World's stories to rivals.Mr Coulson sent the instruction on 20 May 2006 during an email conversation with a senior NoW journalist about a forthcoming exclusive on Calum Best, a two-time contestant on Celebrity Love Island and the son of footballer George Best.Mr Coulson wrote: "You think Calum a leak?", to which the executive replied that Mr Best was "bragging I have close mates inside NoW".Asked what he had meant by his subsequent email response, Mr Coulson told the court: "I was in no doubt that this was not an instruction to hack anybody's phone."I remember what this was because it was Rav [Singh] and he was a friend of mine and I remembering authorising the request for billing data for Rav."Ultimately, Mr Coulson told the court: "No evidence was ever put in front of me that Rav was definitively leaking stories."The court has previously been told the News of the World's managing editor, Stuart Kuttner, received a copy of Mr Singh's billing data nine days earlier, on 11 May 2006.Mr Coulson told the court that by sending his "Do his phone" email he was "re-emphasising" that earlier request.He, Mr Kuttner and fellow former NoW editor Rebekah Brooks deny conspiring to hack phones. The case will resume on Tuesday, when Mr Coulson continues his evidence.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News