News

Andy Coulson to face re-trial

30/06/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Andy Coulson, former award-winning editor of the News of the World, is to face a re-trial over allegations he approved cash bribes to "palace cops" to obtain copies of phone directories for the Royal Family, the Old Bailey heard today.

Jurors at the phone hacking trial were last week unable to reach verdicts on two counts of conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office against Coulson and the paper's formeer royal editor, Clive Goodman.

At a pre-sentencing hearing at the Old Bailey, Andrew Edis, QC, announced that the Crown Prosecution Service would press ahead with a retrial of those two charges. Prosecutors, he added, would ask for Coulson's conviction for phone hacking to be admitted as part of the evidence.

If a judge decides the jury should not hear about that convictions, prosecutors expect defence lawyers for Coulson and Goodman to apply to throw out the charges on the basis that media coverage of Coulson's conviction means that neither could have a fair trial.

Mr Edis made the announcement at Court 12 of the Old Bailey shortly before summarising the case against the five News of the World journalists who have been convicted of phone hacking charges. In the dock alongside Coulson were three former news editors, Greg Miskiw, Neville Thurlbeck and James Weatherup, who pleaded guilty to conspiring to hack voicemails last summer, and private detective Glenn Mulcaire – who pleaded guilty to three substantive counts of phone hacking, including hacking Milly Dowler last March.

In a robust statement to the judge Mr Justice John Saunders, Mr Edis said:• The News of the World was a "thoroughly criminal enterprise"• Phone hacking was carried out on an "industrial scale", approved of and participated in by senior managers up to the editor• Voicemails were intercepted by the news and features departments, meaning there were two separate criminal conspiracies to hack phones at the NoW• Phone hacking began at the News of the World before private detective Glenn Mulcaire was awarded an annual contract in September 2001• Victims included Cabinet Ministers and members of the Royal Family and read like "Who's Who?" of British society.

Mr Edis told the Old Bailey he would spare those victims from having fresh assault on their privacy by detailing in court what had happened to them.

But, asking for the five hackers to pay £700,000 prosecution costs, he said: "What happened was the repeated invasion of privacy for stories, that had the capacity to do serious harm to the victims."

Painting a picture of a tabloid mired in "morally wicked intrusion," he said that on learning Milly Dowler might be working in the Midlands, the News of the World's hackers waited at least 24 hours before informing police of her believed whereabouts.

The prosecutor told the court: "If she had been alive, which she wasn't, during that 24 hours she would have been exposed to avoidable danger."

Mr Edis said Miskiw was the most involved in hacking, with 1,500 taskings of Mulcaire, followed by Thurlbeck with 261 and Weatherup, who had 137 and was "the least implicated," Mr Edis said.

He told Mr Justice Saunders - who will sentence the five on Friday - that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 carried a maximum jail term of two years.

Lawyers for the five will give their mitigation this afternoon.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News