News

Army officer was paid £5000 for Prince William bikini picture court hears

22/01/2015

A former Sandhurst instructor was paid £5000 by News International for a picture of the heir to the throne in a green bikini a jury was told today. However, despite the purchase of the bikini picture being authorised by then Sun editor Rebekah Brooks, the newspaper never published the photograph and instead used a mock-up featuring an actor.John Hardy, 43, is charged, along with his wife Claire, of committing misconduct in a public office by selling confidential information to Sun royal editor Duncan Larcombe. Larcombe and three other journalists are also facing charges including conspiracy.Prosecutor Mark Bryan-Heron told the court that this was just one of the stories the former Sandhurst instructor sold to The Sun while Prince William and Prince Harry were cadets at the Royal military college.While some of the payments were for specific stories, such as "King of the Chavs", about Prince William dressed up "as a working class person", others were for general information on the two princes such as "training schedule" or "general info" the prosecutor said.Amongst the alleged payments to Hardy, the court heard, was one of £250 to allow him to go out with a group of other Sandhurst staff to The Honeypot Club. The Sun subsequently ran a story accusing the group of being hypocrites as they had previously disciplined Prince Harry for attending a strip club. It was headlined "Stripocracy".All of the defendants deny all of the charges, the trial continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News