News

Brooks believed Dowler hacking story was 'BBC-Guardian-Old Labour hit', court hears

23/01/2014

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

By Martin Hickman

Rebekah Brooks appeared to believe that reports on the hacking of Milly Dowler were part of a co-ordinated exercise against News International by the BBC, the Guardian newspaper and members of the Labour Party.

On 5 July 2011, the day after the Guardian broke the news that the News of the World had targeted the missing schoolgirl, Mrs Brooks emailed the then editor of the Times, James Harding, the phone hacking trial heard. In the message read out to the jury, News International's chief executive asked Mr Harding: "Can you find out from Sean [O'Neill, Times crime correspondent] how he knows page 1 and 3 are true?"

Mrs Brooks, who was editor of the News of the World when it targeted the schoolgirl, but was on holiday when it happened, wrote: "We have zero veracity on the truth of these allegations."

She explained that News International had not been informed by the Metropolitan Police or Surrey Police that the paper had targeted Milly Dowler.

She complained to Mr Harding: "This is a proper BBC-Guardian-Old Labour hit." Referring to the Labour MP Tom Watson, she added: "Tom Watson tweeted earlier yesterday that exciting things were coming."

Neil Saunders, representing Mrs Brooks's husband Charlie, raised the e-mail during discussion of the leaking of police material to the Guardian earlier in 2011. No response from Mr Harding was read to the jury. He is now head of BBC News.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News