News

Brooks PA had several meetings with hacking trial defendant, Old Bailey hears

09/01/2014

By Martin HickmanOne of Rebekah Brooks's personal assistants had several meetings with a defendant in the hacking trial after giving a statement to police, the Old Bailey heard today.Witness Deborah Keegan said she had met Mrs Brooks's other PA Cheryl Carter five or six times and had also been in text and email communication with her since November 2011 when she made her first statement to detectives, the Old Bailey heard.Asked who had approved the contact, Mrs Keegan said she had spoken to Kathleen Harris, a specialist in white-collar crime at law firm Arnold Porter who is acting for Rupert Murdoch's rebranded newspaper group News UK.Mrs Keegan divulged the meetings to Andrew Edis QC, chief prosecutor at the trial.Giving evidence, Mrs Keegan recounted how one Sunday in 2009 she had helped Mrs Carter archive material from Mrs Brooks's office at Wapping as part of an office clean up.The Crown claims notebooks from Mrs Brooks were removed in a deliberate attempt to hide evidence from the hacking inquiry.However, Mrs Keegan said that Mrs Brooks had not been present while the boxes were being packed.Jonathan Laidlaw QC, asked her: "Mrs Brooks had nothing to do with whatever went into those boxes, the labelling of them or their sending to the archive?"Mrs Keegan replied: "That's correct."Mr Laidlaw continued: "Mrs Brooks had as far as you can tell nothing to do with the decision to remove them?""Yes," said Mrs Keegan.For the prosecution, Mr Edis asked Mrs Carter whether she had met Mrs Carter since making her first statement to detectives.About five times, Mrs Keegan said, adding: "It could be six."Asked who had given her the green light to have such meetings, she replied: "I would talk to Kathleen Harris sometimes... she's working for News UK as a lawyer."Mr Edis continued: "Did you ask the police or the CPD whether it was a good idea to meet.""No, I didn't," Mrs Keegan replied.She added that there had always been someone else present at the "casual" meetings, which took the form or a drink in a pub or lunch in a hamburger bar.Mr Edis asked: "What was the point of them?"Mrs Keegan replied: "The point was to see my friend who I hadn't seen in a long while."Judge John Saunders asked Mrs Keegan: "Have you ever talked about the case?"Mrs Keegan replied: "No, we're told that we shouldn't."Mrs Keegan, who still works for News UK, has not been discharged from giving evidence and is expected to resume it this afternoon.Mrs Brooks and Mrs Carter deny conspiring to pervert the course of justice. The case continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News