News

Brooks: Piers Morgan "may" have mentioned phone hacking in 2004

11/03/2014

By Martin HickmanJournalist and former chat show host Piers Morgan may have mentioned phone hacking in 2004, two years before detectives arrested two News of the World figures for intercepting the voicemails of the Royal Household, the Old Bailey heard today.Rebekah Brooks conceded that her then friend and redtop rival may have joked that he had hacked her phone while they celebrated the birthday of fellow editor Andy Coulson at a London steak restaurant - but said that she could not remember.Witness Ambi Sitham, a lawyer attending the party as then girlfriend of celebrity publicist Neil Reading, told the court that she overheard banter between Mrs Brooks, editing the Sun, and Mr Morgan, editing the Daily Mirror.Prosecutor Andrew Edis QC asked Mrs Brooks, giving evidence for the third week at the phone hacking trial, whether there had been a conversation about hacking at the dinner.Mrs Brooks said: "I don't remember a discussion about phone hacking because it was the night the Sun had a big story [A leak of the Hutton Inquiry report into Iraq]."I was very surprised at the witness's recollections that she sat next to me that night. She didn't seem to remember anything about it."Mrs Brooks went on: "I don't remember Piers Morgan saying he hacked my phone. I don't remember that."He may have said that. I just don't remember that."

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News