News

Civil servant sentenced over Sun budget leak

06/02/2015

A former HMRC press officer has narrowly avoided imprisonment over receiving payments from a Sun journalist for confidential information.Sentencing Jonathan Hall at London's Old Bailey Judge Rook said he regarded the defendants conduct as an "affront to the standing of the public office you held", and said that in normal circumstances he would have imposed an immediate prison sentence. However given Hall's early guilty plea and the 32 months he has spent on bail the judge decided to suspend an eight month sentence and impose 200 hours of unpaid work.Earlier the court was told that Hall had leaked details of the 2010 budget to The Sun's then Whitehall editor Clodagh Hartley in exchange for payment. He had also given the journalist information about treasury officials having a party and senior officials using first class rail travel. Hartley herself was acquitted of conspiracy at a trial held late last year.In mitigation defence counsel, Richard Wormald, had told the judge that his client had been "seduced by the money" offered by the newspaper. Since his arrest, he said, Hall had been doing voluntary PR work for a homelessness charity and faced losing his home if sent to prison. He also noted that Hall’s partner, Marta Bukarewicz, had stood by him even though he had embroiled her in his offending and she had also faced a stressful trial. "You should be very grateful to her" Judge Rook told the defendant.Bukarewicz was in the public gallery for the sentencing hearing and burst into tears when the result was announced.Summing up Judge Rook told Hall "your job was to manage the dissemination of news, not to make it for your own personal enrichment", adding "the real criminality in this case was that you had two paymasters, HMRC and News International".

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News