News

Clive Goodman: I exaggerated the importance of my stories

20/03/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

At the phone hacking trial today Clive Goodman admitted exaggerating the importance of his stories, but denied being "over-dramatic" or "florid" in his dealings with the News of the World executives.

In emails to the editor Andy Coulson, Mr Goodman, then royal editor, referred to the need for the paper to pay his palace policemen sources in cash, adding that they could all go to jail if anyone found out.

Cross-examining Mr Goodman, Mr Coulson's lawyer Timothy Langdale QC, read out an email he sent to Mr Coulson on 10 May 2002 about the forthcoming trial of Princess Diana's former butler Paul Burrell.

In the message, Mr Goodman warned him there could be trouble if Mr Burrell's former publicist, Max Clifford, divulged secrets about the court case, telling him: "If he so much as whispers it we're all going to jail for contempt.”

Mr Langdale questioned whether "we're all going to jail" was "florid language", to which Mr Goodman replied, to laughter, that readers of the News of the World would realise it contained dramatic language.

Mr Langdale countered that Mr Goodman personally would "tend to use florid and over-dramatic language.”

No, Mr Goodman said, adding that he would use words to make a point.

Mr Langdale asked: "Over-exaggeration?", to which the former royal editor said: "Yes, reporters do talk up stories.”

Challenged about another email to management in which Mr Goodman warned that he could end up wearing "concrete wellies" unless a contact was paid, he told the court he didn't think anyone would have taken that comment seriously.

Mr Langdale put it to Mr Goodman: "Quite often you would be talking nonsense but pretending not to." Mr Goodman told the court: "I don't think so.”

Mr Goodman and Mr Coulson deny conspiring to commit misconduct in public office. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News