News

Clive Goodman received royal phone books from fellow journalists

17/03/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Clive Goodman received three royal phone directories from fellow journalists, he told the phone hacking trial today.

Mr Goodman, the News of the World's former royal editor, said that one of the sources for which he arranged cash payments was a freelancer, while the other was a newspaper executive.

In emails to the NoW's management in 2005 and 2006, Mr Goodman said that the payments to his contacts must be made in cash because otherwise the individuals - which he said at the time included "two in uniform - could be jailed.

That led to him being charged with two counts of conspiring to commit misconduct in public office.

However, giving evidence at the hacking trial for the second day, Mr Goodman said he thought one of the sources, "Anderson", was a freelancer - while "Farrish" was a newspaper executive, involved in production rather than a reporter.

He told the Old Bailey that they were not their real names, saying that he had made them up by choosing surnames and address randomly from residential phone books.

Mr Goodman said he occasionally used the names interchangeably and sometimes used them to make payments to other sources.

Explaining how he had first been in contact with the sources, Mr Goodman said both Farrish and Anderson had initially phones him with tip offs.

The information coming from them often seemed to be second or third hand, he told the jury.

On Anderson, whom Mr Goodman paid between 2 January 2001 and 21 April 2006, Mr Goodman said: "I met him in parks or cafes or bars around Fleet Street."

On Farrish, whom he paid between 13 February 2002 and 28 March 2006, Mr Goodman said: "He wasn't there [the Royal Household] himself."

Asked about royal phone directories, Mr Goodman, said knew of at least two other journalists who had them: the Daily Mail's Richard Kay and the late Mirror journalist James Whittaker.

He told the court he had "dozens, scores" of contacts during his 20-year career at the paper, saying: "Some worked for the Royal Family, some were friends of the Royal Family, indeed some were members of the Royal Family themselves."

But he complained there were sometimes delays of months in processing cash payments, adding: "It was unpredictable."

Mr Goodman, who in 2006 admitted conspiring to hack the phones of royal aides, and his then editor, Andy Coulson, deny two counts of conspiring to commit misconduct in public office. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News