News

Co-signatories warn Cameron against breaching 2013 cross-party press agreement

08/04/2016

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats – which co-signed the historic 2013 cross-party agreement on press self-regulation – have now publicly demanded that David Cameron deliver on his promises.

Labour accuse him of ‘back-tracking’ on implementing the Leveson reforms while the Liberal Democrats say he seems to care more about media moguls than about those who suffer at the hands of the press.

The parties were responding to this week’s open letter to the Prime Minister from victims of press abuse, who expressed anger that he is breaking a string of promises to them on press reform.

Maria Eagle, Labour’s Shadow Culture Secretary, said: ‘It’s time David Cameron and his Culture Secretary, John Whittingdale, delivered on the Government’s clear promise to the British public, to Parliament and directly to the victims of phone hacking and fully implemented the cross-party agreement on Leveson’s recommendations.’

Liberal Democrat spokesman Lord Clement-Jones said: ‘The Prime Minister must reassure people immediately that he intends to implement the agreement; his silence so far is a strong cause for concern.’

The cross-party agreement sprang from a rare consensus that, because politicians must not play politics with press freedom, there would be a non-partisan approach to implementing the Leveson Inquiry recommendations. At the time, the Prime Minister not only stressed the importance of implementation, but he welcomed and praised this cross-party cooperation.*Maria Eagle called on Cameron to honour the agreement: ‘The Government must get on with commencing Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 immediately and get on with facilitating the second part of the Leveson inquiry.

‘By pretending it is business as usual and backtracking on Leveson, the Tories are deliberately turning a blind eye to serious allegations of high-level corruption and collusion between the press, the police, politicians and the judiciary.’

Lord Clement-Jones said: ‘Cameron’s failure to uphold cross-party agreement on press regulation has left victims of press intrusion feeling like his loyalties lie more with media moguls than with the people who have had their privacy invaded.

‘The Liberal Democrats fought hard to secure this deal when we were in Government and we will continue fighting to make sure it is delivered.’-------*For example, on 18 March 2013, he said:‘Let me conclude by saying a word about the process by which the agreement has been reached and about the next steps. The royal charter agreed today has benefited hugely from hundreds of hours of detailed negotiations with representatives of victims, all main political parties and the press themselves, and has been further improved by the hours of discussions between the parties this weekend. I am grateful for the spirit of give and take on all sides. We stand here today with a cross-party agreement for a new system of press regulation that supports our great traditions of investigative journalism and free speech and protects the rights of the vulnerable and the innocent. If this system is implemented, the country should have confidence that the terrible suffering of innocent victims, such as the Dowlers, the McCanns and Christopher Jeffries, should never be repeated. My message to the press is now very clear: we have had the debate, now it is time to get on and make this system work.’

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News