News

Comment: Boris Johnson story in the Guardian

25/06/2019

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

On Friday 21st June it was reported in the Guardian newspaper that Boris Johnson MP, who is standing to be leader of the Conservative Party and therefore Prime Minister, had had an altercation with his partner. The Guardian reported that loud screams and shouts had been heard from the home they were living in, and a woman (Mr Johnson’s partner, it is presumed) was shouting “Get off me”.

A number of prominent individuals who are critical of independent press regulation have come forward to criticise the Guardian’s reporting as an invasion of Mr Johnson’s privacy, while simultaneously publishing extremely invasive stories about the neighbours who reported what they believed to be domestic violence.

Hacked Off welcome the belated acknowledgement of Trevor Kavanagh, Matt Hancock, Brendan O’Neill (all who have criticised the coverage) and other opponents of independent regulation that newspaper publishers should have respect for people’s private lives. Even the Spectator have published a blog which suggests they too have become latter-day converts to the principle of journalistic accountability and ethics.

It is a shame t took a senior politician claiming his privacy was invaded for these characters to speak up, after seeing years of ordinary people’s privacy being disregarded and violated by national newspapers.

Hacked Off support journalism which is in the public interest, and have a record of fighting for legal reforms to ensure journalists who are acting in the public interest are protected – often without support from the largest newspaper publishers.

Hacked Off are not a regulator and we would not engage in a question of whether the Guardian’s reporting would be in breach of any code. It should be up to an independent regulator to consider whether reporting on this story was in the public interest. The Guardian should join or establish such a regulator.

It is certainly our view that any allegation of domestic violence against a serving politician, if that is what the story was to amount to, has the potential to be fully protected by the public interest.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News