Fact-check

Compare and Contrast: The Sun's headline and the apology

21/10/2014

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP
The Sun Devil Mark Cover

At the end of July The Sun picked up a ‘story’ which had appeared on the Facebook page of a mother from Shropshire. The woman had posted a photograph of the boy with a curious mark on his torso. The Sun somehow managed to turn this inconsequential ‘news’ into a front-page lead with a photograph of the boy’s face, bare chest and a tendentious headline: ‘Boy, 4, has mark of devil’.

The paper even gave details of the child’s medical history – he has a rare disease – and named him and his primary school. Although it was clear that the boy’s parents had cooperated with The Sun, it was clearly outrageous breach of the child’s privacy and put him at risk of mockery and bullying.

Yesterday The Sun, following a complaint by Dr Sarah Wollaston MP, admitted it had got it wrong and would be changing its procedures regarding children. They also promised to publish an acknowledgement that they got it wrong.

Today we got the admission and the publication. The original story was page 1, the apology is page 2. For your ease we’ve put the two side-by-side (see picture).

Is the contrition comparable to the original offence? We’ll let you compare and make your own mind up.

You can read our original analysis of the story here.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

How Do You Turn Data Showing Brits Hold 80% of Jobs Into “Foreigners Took 4 out of 5 of New Jobs”?
Well, you pass the data through a right-wing think tank and spit it out in right-wing media headlines. A guest fact-check by Emma Monk of Monk Debunks.
10/15/26
Fact-check
No, we don't spend £74 million a year on branded condoms for Pakistan
No, we don't spend £74 million a year on branded condoms for Pakistan
Tracing the City AM headline back to Matt Goodwin's LBC claim and back through Guido Fawkes to a UK aid programme for women in rural Pakistan. A guest fact-check by Emma Monk of Monk Debunks.
10/6/26
Fact-check
No, ‘More Freedom’ is NOT ‘handed to new arrivals than British citizens’
As misleading front page headlines go, this one from the Express has to be up there with some of the worst! A guest fact-check by Emma Monk of Monk Debunks.
9/24/26
Fact-check
A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
Fact-check