News

Coulson: no knowledge that NOTW detective accessed Milly Dowler's voicemail

15/04/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Andy Coulson had no knowledge that the News of the World's private detective had accessed Milly Dowler's voicemail, he told the phone hacking trial today.

Mr Coulson, acting editor of the paper when it published a story on the missing 13-year-old, said that he did not believe he knew that seven of the paper's staff had travelled to the Midlands in a fruitless attempt to find her.

The court has heard that that attempt was prompted by Glenn Mulcaire's hacking a voicemail message left on Milly's phone by a recruitment agency (who turned out to have mis-dialled a number.)

Asked about his general knowledge of phone hacking around the time Milly disappeared in 2002, Mr Coulson told the Old Bailey: "I think I was aware of it in very vague terms. It was in the ether, if I can put it that way. It was something gossiped about."

But he said he did not have any personal experience of hacking, telling his counsel Timothy Langdale QC: "I did not, no."

In answer to Mr Langdale's query as to whether he was "a party to or in agreement with phone hacking at the News of the World," Mr Coulson replied firmly: "No, I was not."

Asked: "Were you aware of any activity by the News of the World in relation to hacking of Milly Dowler's voicemail?" Mr Coulson again replied: "No, I was not."

Mr Coulson, deputy editor of the NoW between 2000 and 2003, said he was not aware that accessing voicemails was a crime.

Asked what he would have thought about hacking anyway, he told the court: "I would have thought it was intrusive and a breach of privacy - and I would have thought it was lazy journalism."

In the run up to Sunday 14 April 2002, the NoW was trying to ascertain whether Milly was attending a job interview at a computer factory and sent five reporters and two photographers to Telford to check out the story.

Asked about the tasking, Mr Coulson, acting editing the paper that week while Rebekah Brooks was on holiday in Dubai, said: "No, I don't think I did know that reporters had been sent to Telford."

Asked why top NoW journalist Neville Thurlbeck had phoned him at 9.43pm on Friday 12 April, he said that he was probably ringing to discuss the first editions of Saturday's papers.

Mr Langdale asked: "Did there come point where you learned from Neville Thurlbeck or anybody else that there was a possibility of Milly Dowler being interviewed for a job?", to which he replied: "Yes."

Asked when, Mr Coulson told the court: "I can't place it precisely or approximately."

But he said he thought the idea of Milly working at a factory was "ludicrous" because she was only 13 and her photograph had been all over the papers.

He had given no credence to the story.

The "mystery" voicemail left by the recruitment agency for Milly was the page 9 lead in the first edition of the News of the World on Sunday 14 April 2002, which Mr Coulson edited. Asked about it, he said: "I don't remember reading this story, so I'm to a degree reconstructing."

But he added he had probably played a role in downgrading the story - which the police had told the NoW was probably the work of a hoaxer - in later editions. Mr Coulson said: "I think what happened this week is that I went through the first edition of the paper and felt that the mix was wrong."

He, Mrs Brooks and the paper's managing editor, Stuart Kuttner, deny conspiring to hack voicemails. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News