News

Coulson tells hacking trial of "irony" over exposing Blunkett affair

24/04/2014

By Martin HickmanAndy Coulson today told the hacking trial he was aware of the "irony" of his newspaper exposing an affair by a senior politician while having a long-running extra-marital affair himself.A front-page story in Mr Coulson's News of the World in 2004 revealed that the then Home Secretary, David Blunkett, was in a relationship with a married woman.The story was obtained by the News of the World by intercepting Mr Blunkett's messages to the publisher Kimberly Fortier and 300 hacked messages were found in a safe at the London headquarters of its owner, News International.In earlier evidence Mr Coulson told the case that he was "shocked" to be told by his chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, that he had hacked the messages, but published the story anyway because he thought it was in the public interest.Evidence presented to the court has revealed that between 1998 and 2006 while their newspapers were exposing extra-marital affairs Mr Coulson and his fellow redtop editor, Rebekah Brooks, were having an affair while married to other people.Asked by Clive Goodman's lawyer, David Spens QC today about his decision to run the Blunkett story despite its illegal origin, Mr Coulson told the Old Bailey: "I regret the decision I made."Mr Coulson went on: "This is a story about someone's private life, and given what was going on in my own private life the irony of it is not lost on me.""Pure hypocrisy, isn't it?" asked Mr Spens.Mr Coulson repeated to the jury: "The irony of it is not lost on me."He confirmed that following publication of the front-page story, headlined: "Blunkett's Affair With A Married Woman", no disciplinary action was taken against Thurlbeck.Asked if he had had a conversation with him about the story after publication, Mr Coulson replied: "Not that I remember."He agreed that he had not launched an internal inquiry into the hacking or raised the issue with the Press Complaints Commission.Mr Spens asked the journalist: "So the story which is a product of phone hacking is out but nothing seems to be happening within your organisation to prevent it happening again?"Mr Coulson replied: "The story had been brought to me by the chief reporter... and I made the decision I made - and I have told the court I think it was a mistake."Mr Coulson, who edited the News of the World between 2003 and 2007, denies conspiring to intercept communications. The case, which began in October, continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News