News

Edmondson extended Mulcaire's contract, after initially stopping payments, hacking trial hears

20/11/2013

DAY 18 - Wed 20 Nov 2013 (update)By Martin HickmanThe News of the World's news editor, Ian Edmondson, extended its £100,000-year-contract with the private detective Glenn Mulcaire after initially ordering the payments to be stopped, the hacking trial heard today.This morning the Old Bailey heard that in February 2005, soon after rejoining the newspaper from the Sunday People, Mr Edmondson instructed a clerk, James Morgan, to stop paying £2,000 a week to News Consultancy, one of Mulcaire's companies.After lunch, prosecutor Mark Bryant-Heron read out an email from Mr Edmondson to Mulcaire renewing his contract until February 2007.Before the contract concluded, Mulcaire was arrested by the Metropolitan Police and pleaded guilty in November 2006 - and again this year - to illegally accessing voicemail messages.In the message, Mr Edmondson wrote: "This is to confirm that your contract will remain the same... Regards, Ian Edmondson. Happy now? Grumpy."In other email correspondence, the NoW royal editor, Clive Goodman told Mr Edmondson: "The tale comes from William himself." In another message, Mr Goodman said he assumed that the news editor had been using some of the "dark arts."Mr Bryant-Heron quoted from a letter from NoW managing editor, Bill Akass to Mr Edmondson on 27 January 2011 dismissing him from his position as Associate Editor (News), for gross misconduct arising from illegal voicemail interception.Mr Edmondson and the other defendants deny all charges. The case continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News