News

Hacking trial: News of the World exec was "gentleman," says Sara Payne

11/04/2014

Friday 11 April 2014

By Martin Hickman

The mother of murdered eight-year-old Sarah Payne today paid tribute to two defendants at the phone hacking trial.

Appearing as a character witness for Stuart Kuttner, Sara Payne said that had received great help from the News of the World's managing editor during and after the paper's anti-paedophile For Sarah campaign.

She also praised Rebekah Brooks, saying that she was "sweet natured" and could be called upon at any time to provide comfort and advice.

Mrs Payne, recalling how she had met Mr Kuttner after her daughter's disappearance and that he had helped her through subsequent illnesses, told the Old Bailey: "Stuart is a gentleman."

"He is everything my parents taught me about being a gentleman: about having manners and good etiquette. He's a good guy."

Asked by Mr Kuttner's QC Jonathan Caplan whether she rated his integrity highly, Mrs Payne told the jury: "I absolutely do."

She said that Mrs Brooks was "personally very sweet," adding that she was a straight-talker who addressed issues directly.

Ending his four days in the witness stand, Mr Kuttner said that he could not recall what he had known in April 2002 about the News of the World's acquisition of a voicemail message left on Milly Dowler's phone. In an email to Surrey police, shown to the jury earlier in the trial, Mr Kuttner had asked detectives about the voicemail.

Andrew Edis QC, asked whether Mr Kuttner had known that the message had been obtained by the paper "by hacking voicemail messages"?

"Well, by whatever method it was obtained," the journalist replied.

Mr Edis continued: "You must have known that somebody had unlawfully intercepted this phone", to which Mr Kuttner - who frequently said he could not remember events because of a medical condition - replied: "I don't accept that, sir."

Mr Kuttner said: "I have no recollection how we had that information."

He denies conspiring to hacking voicemails. The trial is due to continue on Monday.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News