News

Hacking Trial: prosecutors to announce whether Coulson will face re-trial

25/06/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Prosecutors will announce within days whether Andy Coulson will face a re-trial on charges he and former News of the World colleague Clive Goodman paid cash bribes to police officers guarding the Royal Family, the Old Bailey was told today.

Andrew Edis, QC, revealed the Crown Prosecution Service would make the announcement on Monday after the jury were unable to reach a verdict in Counts 2 and 3 of the seven counts at the phone hacking trial.

While editor of the News of the World Coulson was alleged to have conspired with royal editor Mr Goodman to commit misconduct in a public office by paying cash to Royal and Diplomatic Protection Squad for palace phone directories - which the prosecution alleged were used for phone hacking.

Discharging the jury shortly after midday, the judge, Mr Justice Saunders thanked the 11 jurors for their dedication and diligence during the eight month-long case.

They returned a guilty verdict on Coulson for conspiring to hack phones yesterday hacking - while indicating they were deadlocked on the bribery charges faced by the Prime Minister's former director of communications.

In a note passed to Mr Justice Saunders shortly after resuming deliberations at 11am, the jury stated they would be unable to come to a decision.

The judge had allowed them to continue their deliberations after rejecting applications by counsel for Coulson and Goodman that prejudicial media coverage and criticism of Coulson by politicians - including David Cameron's apology for hiring him - would taint their deliberations.

Timothy Langdale, QC, for Coulson, told the court it was "wholly unrealistic and quite hopeless for the jury to disregard the media coverage." He added that the "ill-advised premature intervention of the Prime Minister... is impossible for the jury to ignore."

Allowing the jury to continue, Mr Justice Saunders said that the acquittals of Rebekah Brooks - whose QC made repeated attempts to throw out the case against her on the grounds of unfair media coverage - showed the jury was capable of disregarding media coverage.

After discharging the jury little more than an hour later, the judge thanked them, saying: "The country owes you a debt of gratitude. You have given up eight months of your life for jury service despite the inconvenience."

He said the case was an important one, saying about Rupert Murdoch's UK newspaper group, News International: "The public were entitled to know who was criminal involved at senior level."

In all the jury, who lost one of their number to illness during the trial, sat for 43 hours and 54 minutes.

Yesterday, on their eight day of deliberations, they unanimously convicted Coulson of conspiracy to hack phones between 2000 and 2006 while in charge of the News of he World, the country's best-selling Sunday newspaper.

They returned not guilty verdicts on Rebekah Brooks on counts of conspiracy to hack phones, conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. They also returned not guilty verdicts on Stuart Kuttner, the News of the World's former managing editor - for conspiring to hack phones - and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice charges against Mrs Brooks' husband Charlie, PA Cheryl Carter and News International's head of security, Mark Hanna.

Following the partial verdicts, the judge was left fuming by Mr Cameron's decision to invite a TV crew into Downing Street for an interview in which he implicitly criticised Coulson for misleading him about the extent of crime at the News of the World.

He called for politicians and the media to exercise "restraint" in commenting on the case because the jury were continuing to consider the corruption charges.

With the jury now discharged, the full story of criminality at the News of the World and News International's attempts to cover it up can be told.

Martin Hickman covered every day of the trial for Hacked Off. He is publishing a book by Peter Jukes on the case titled: Beyond Contempt - The Inside Story of the Phone Hacking Trial at hackingtrial.com

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News