News

Celebrity magazine editors give evidence to Leveson

18/01/2012

Editors from three top-selling magazines have given evidence to the Leveson Inquiry this morning.Lucie Cave from Heat, Hello! co-editor Rosie Nixon and Lisa Byrne of OK! were jointly questioned on celebrity stories, privacy and regulation.All three editors agreed that private lives were not "open season", even if a celebrity has previously agreed to be in a magazine.Rosie Nixon told the inquiry she would not publish information about a celebrity if they claimed it was untrue and "trusting relationships" were key to the running of her magazine.Cave was asked about a PCC complaint made by Katie Price after Heat published a sticker set including a picture of her son with a caption attached, which she claimed mocked his disability.Cave was not editor at the time but said: "Everyone is mortified by that incident".She was also asked about pictures of Simon Cowell on a private yacht printed in the magazine, and said the paper had a good relationship with him and he "enjoyed his celebrity lifestyle".Byrne was asked by inquiry counsel about an interviews with Sienna Miller printed in OK! claiming to be "exclusive", when in fact taken from other sources. An apology was issued to Miller on the magazine's website. She said a recent front page of the magazine depicting the Duchess of Cambridge was not purposefully misleading.She said she was not aware whether an offer of an exclusive interview with OK! was made to the McCanns as a "bargaining tool", when questioned over evidence they gave to the inquiry last year, and said the magazine had independent content from other Northern & Shell publications.On corrections, Cave said Heat had only received eight complaints in 14 years. Byrne revealed that OK! only had a "handful" of readers' complaints and published approximately two apologies a year. Nixon said she was not aware any complaints under her editorship.Lord Justice Leveson suggested that a register of celebrities could be an option, ensuring the privacy of publicity-shy figures.Byrne said it could be overused while Nixon said it could be "useful for future reference".The Hello! editor also said she worried about "over-regulation" of the press, and the magazine industry should be better represented in a new system.Byrne said despite being outside the PCC, OK! works within the code and her relationship with the body had been "good" in the past.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News