News

Fleet Street legend throws weight behind Leveson Bill

29/01/2013

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Former Times and Sunday Times editor, Sir Harold Evans has launched an outspoken attack on the "cynicism and arrogance" of the response by newspapers to the proposals of Lord Justice Leveson for regulatory reform and has given his public backing to the Leveson Bill proposed by Hacked Off.

Going on to describe Leveson's proposals as a way to "protect privacy and encourage high standards while enlarging, not diminishing, the freedom of the press," Sir Harold rejected suggestions that the judge's recommendations posed any threat to press freedom.

Sir Harold condemned "much of the reaction to Leveson, coming from figures in the press who did nothing to penetrate – indeed whose inertia assisted – the cover-up conducted into oblivion by News International".

Questioned by Bob Satchwell, chair of the Society of Editors, at the annual Hugh Cudlipp lecture in London last night, Sir Harold said that while safeguards were undoubtedly needed to ensure the freedom of the press from Government control, he believed that proposals put forward by the Labour party and the Hacked Off campaign contained sufficient provisions that such interference would not take place.

You can read Sir Harry's full speech here.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News