News

Legal blogger defends online self-regulation at the Leveson Inquiry

25/01/2012

A legal blogger has defended online self-regulation and the reliability of social media before Lord Justice Leveson.David Allen Green, a lawyer, legal correspondent for the New Statesman, and author of the Jack of Kent blog, said there is a “great deal of self-regulation and responsibly” amongst bloggers and social media users.He admitted blogging can be misused in the same way as mainstream media and the law but said there was an emphasis on online transparency and accountability.He said: “The notion that bloggers out there are cowboys…is looking at it in a very wrong way."Most alleged abuses by people using social media often can be traced back to someone who may or may not have an agenda.”Green told the inquiry that important stories not covered in the mainstream media were often taken forward by citizens using social media.He said “first rate” information is vital for responsible blogging and urged public bodies to work with social media rather than against it. He advocated people having time to step back and compile material for themselves from online sources.He added: “The better blogs and the better tweeters link to information."Green said Twitter users had shown restraint by not linking to a legally ambiguous article by Rod Liddle on the Stephen Lawrence case.He said although the CTB injunction had been widely mocked and broken by social media users, further sensitive information on the case had not been passed around.He also described gathering information on "David Rose" after several Wikipedia pages were edited by an account in this name. Rose was later discovered to be an online alias of journalist Johann Hari.He told the inquiry he had suggested Hari be sent for training:He said: “I don’t want to use my blogging for people to lose their jobs. It doesn’t seem appropriate."

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News