News

Leveson calls on newspapers to reveal which journalists used PI Steve Whittamore

23/07/2012

Lord Justice Leveson has called on the press to give evidence on which journalists used private investigator Steve Whittamore.The judge said newspaper groups had until September 10 to reveal which of their journalists commissioned the investigator – the source of the Operation Motorman files – to obtain personal data and what happened to that information.The inquiry is likely to sit again in August for a hearing on evidence relating to Operation Motorman. Lord Justice Leveson said he expected more evidence to emerge from submissions, the Motorman hearing and police investigations but it was “comparatively remote” the inquiry would hold more public hearings.Newspaper publishers will be served with letters, under rule 13 of the Inquiry Rules 2006, informing them of any criticism of their titles in the inquiry’s final report, due in the autumn.The judge warned newspapers against publishing these letters as “emerging thoughts”, saying to do so would “misunderstand the purpose of the exercise and the position of the inquiry”.Press reports of the inquiry will continue to be added to official evidence until the final report is submitted to the culture secretary and home secretary.The judge added: "I will consider reports that in my view either support or undermine concerns that have been expressed in evidence, I will equally considered the validity of the comments that are critical of the direction or approach of the inquiry."Lord Justice Leveson also invited Lloyd Embley, editor of the People, to respond to claims made by Matt Sprake of NewsPics picture agency last week. The inquiry heard how Sprake had been commissioned hundreds of times to follow and photograph public figures and celebrities – largely by the People and the News of the World.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News