News

Leveson dismisses suggestions inquiry will recommend statutory regulation

10/01/2012

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Lord Justice Leveson revealed his personal feelings on press reform today, telling the inquiry he "would be surprised if government regulation ever even entered my mind”.

The judge was speaking to TMG chief executive Murdoch MacLennan, who gave oral evidence to the inquiry. MacLennan had expressed concern over the affordability of future regulation, especially in regard to privacy and libel actions.

Leveson also expressed his desire for change, telling the inquiry that he does not wish his eventual report to be something “everybody likes or rubbishes” and that ends up just sitting "on a shelf”.

The inquiry also heard from Financial Times editor Lionel Barber, who put forward ideas on independent regulation. He advocated a regulatory body with new powers – including the power to investigate – that would ensure compliance from all newspapers and some online organisations.

He said "for too long, the PCC was dominated by insiders”, adding that “outsiders”, including experienced journalists and other professionals, should have a seat on the body.

Barber expressed relief when Leveson said he was not interested in setting up a body “full of lawyers” but was interested in a low-cost libel mediation system.

Both MacLennan and Barber confirmed that PCC chairman Lord Hunt is consulting newspapers over press reform and plans to announce his suggestions before the inquiry ends later this year.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News