News

Leveson gives directions for module 2 of the inquiry

25/01/2012

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The Leveson Inquiry will not prejudice police investigations into phone hacking, the chairman has said.

During a hearing where directions for module 2 - relationship between the press and the police - of his inquiry were given, Lord Justice Leveson said he would examine the history of investigations into the press “with a degree of care”.

He added: “I will rigorously follow the self-denying ordinance I set for myself at the beginning of the inquiry, so as not to prejudice an investigation or any potential consequences of that investigation”.

The relationship between the police and the press is to be examined at the inquiry from February 27 to April 19. The Metropolitan Police Authority were made core participants for the module.

Leveson heard from three individuals applying for core participant status including Jonathan King, a singer and record producer convicted and jailed over child sex offences in 2001. King has maintained his innocence since his arrest.

A 7/7 bombings survivor, and Robert Henderson, a writer who claims the Mirror libelled him in 1997, also submitted applications to the judge.

Leveson said: “It is not part of my function, except in certain illustrative ways, to descend into the detail of specific incidents.

“That is not to show disrespect to those who believe they have been wrongly treated by the police or the press, or to suggest that their issues are not important. It is merely to underline the fact that were I to do so, the time I would require to examine each individual incident, many of which are exceedingly complex, would overwhelm the available time resource for this inquiry.”

Barrister David Sherborne asked that core participant victims continue to be represented, saying they had a “direct interest in a number of matters” to be covered in the second module. Tamsin Allen, of Bindmans LLP, will take over from Dominic Crossley of Collyer Bristow as the solicitor dealing with victims.

Leveson asked external submissions of questions for witnesses to be made as soon as possible.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News