News

Leveson gives directions for module 2 of the inquiry

25/01/2012

The Leveson Inquiry will not prejudice police investigations into phone hacking, the chairman has said.During a hearing where directions for module 2 - relationship between the press and the police - of his inquiry were given, Lord Justice Leveson said he would examine the history of investigations into the press “with a degree of care”.He added: “I will rigorously follow the self-denying ordinance I set for myself at the beginning of the inquiry, so as not to prejudice an investigation or any potential consequences of that investigation”.The relationship between the police and the press is to be examined at the inquiry from February 27 to April 19. The Metropolitan Police Authority were made core participants for the module.Leveson heard from three individuals applying for core participant status including Jonathan King, a singer and record producer convicted and jailed over child sex offences in 2001. King has maintained his innocence since his arrest.A 7/7 bombings survivor, and Robert Henderson, a writer who claims the Mirror libelled him in 1997, also submitted applications to the judge.Leveson said: “It is not part of my function, except in certain illustrative ways, to descend into the detail of specific incidents.“That is not to show disrespect to those who believe they have been wrongly treated by the police or the press, or to suggest that their issues are not important. It is merely to underline the fact that were I to do so, the time I would require to examine each individual incident, many of which are exceedingly complex, would overwhelm the available time resource for this inquiry.”Barrister David Sherborne asked that core participant victims continue to be represented, saying they had a “direct interest in a number of matters” to be covered in the second module. Tamsin Allen, of Bindmans LLP, will take over from Dominic Crossley of Collyer Bristow as the solicitor dealing with victims.Leveson asked external submissions of questions for witnesses to be made as soon as possible.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News