News

Lord Smith admits he should have 'pushed further' on press regulation after Princess Diana's death

22/05/2012

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Former culture secretary Lord Smith has admitted he should have “pushed further” on press regulation after the death of Princess Diana.

Smith, secretary of state from 1997 to 2001 under Tony Blair, said changes made to the Press Complaints Commission resulted in a “palpable change of behaviour” from the press but standards had slipped "egregiously".

He said: “I have to hold my hands up and say the changes which we were able to secure in 1997 and which lasted for a two or three year period in terms of their impact and effect, I regret that I didn’t see properly at the time that this wasn’t enough and we should have pushed further.”

Smith said he received 1,200 letters from members of the public criticising reporters and the paparazzi following Diana’s death.

He added: “There are moments when the balance changes in the government’s favour [as opposed to the press] and the death of Diana was one such moment, where there was a clear public demand for change.”

Smith said Lord Wakeham, PCC chairman at the time, was the “nearest we have come” to an individual capable of commanding the respect of the entire press, calling the role of PCC chair “both a regulator and a champion”. He told Lord Justice Leveson the key to independence of a new press regulator was having an "unimpeachably independent" chairman.

He went on to call the PCC “a champion of the free press” but admitted the role of the body had never been properly outlined.

Lord Justice Leveson said he would consider it “a real failure” if after two years the press reverted to unethical behaviour and said it may be difficult to find an individual who can demand the respect of the press with the confidence of politicians and the public.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News