News

Mail picture editor explains alleged harassment of Hugh Grant's baby's mother

11/01/2012

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The picture editor at the Daily Mail appeared before the Leveson Inquiry today to answer questions on the alleged harassment of Hugh Grant.

In November, Grant gave the inquiry a supplementary witness statement, explaining the intrusion he and Tinglan Hong, the mother of his baby daughter, had suffered at the hands of photographers following the birth.

Paul Silva, who has worked for the Daily Mail for over 20 years, suggested Grant should have issued a picture of the child to the press and that interest in the birth was “normal”.

Silva answered questions on the treatment of other celebrities including Sienna Miller, who he said the Mail were not “interested in”, and Pippa Middleton. He said the picture desk receives 300 to 400 images of Middleton every day and most are not printed.

He was asked about pictures taken of the McCann family after they returned to the UK in 2007. He said consent had been given to photograph twins Sean and Amelia, aged two when Madeline was abducted, in Portugal and paparazzi continued under this premise when stationed outside the family’s home in Leicestershire.

Silva said the Mail receives over 30,000 images from around the world everyday and has to make quick decisions over which pictures to print in the paper. He explained his approach to privacy, saying that pictures should not be taken in private places but were acceptable in public.

Leveson replied: “I understand where the line is drawn, the question is whether it’s reasonably drawn."

The picture editor said he does not deal with pictures for Mail Online, which has come under criticism for using intrusive paparazzi photographs, but picture editor Elliot Wagland follows the same standards as the print edition.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News