Briefings

New analysis shows scale of Charter sell-out

04/03/2013

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

As Lord Justice Leveson said in his report, the press has ‘no real appetite for an effective and adequate system of regulation’. Not only did he show in detail how the Press Complaints Commission had been ‘run for the benefit of the press not of the public’, but he demonstrated that even in 2012 things had not changed.

While the inquiry was sitting, PCC bosses put forward a reform plan. Lord Hunt, the last chair of the PCC, and Lord Black, the head of its powerful funding body, proposed a new ‘self-regulator‘ they said would be dramatically different.

Lord Justice Leveson declared that it ‘did not come close’ to a proper regulator. It was, he said, ‘structured entirely around the interests and rights of the press, with no explicit recognition of the rights of the individual’. In other words, like the PCC it would operate ‘for the benefit of the press and not of the public’.

David Cameron also said Hunt-Black was ‘not good enough’, adding: ‘We need more changes.’

In a remarkable turnaround, however, the Conservatives are now proposing a post-Leveson fix that would enable the press to operate the Hunt-Black proposals. An analysis by the Media Standards Trust shows that, barring two technical elements, the scheme that Leveson said ‘did not come close’ would pass muster under the Royal Charter plan advocated by ministers.

Though the policy minister, Oliver Letwin, and the culture secretary, Maria Miller, insist publicly that they intend to implement the Leveson recommendations, they have watered them down so much at the behest of their friends in the press that Lords Hunt and Black could get their way.

This is exactly the kind of fix that occurred in 1990 and 1994, and that gave us all the press outrages of the years that followed, from the hounding of Princess Diana by way of Motorman, phone hacking and the McCann affair, to the hounding of Christopher Jefferies. If the press and the Conservatives get away with this there will be nothing to prevent more such abuses – and of course they won’t be the ones who suffer.

Read more about the Royal Charter proposals here.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
Briefings
Reporting montage
Professor Arday, IPSO, and the press: steps to end the cycle of tragedy
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg, Professor of Media Law at the University of Leeds, on why the press hounding of Professor Jason Arday will happen again unless politicians act.
8/16/26
Briefings
Daily Mail Hacking Trial
All the latest on the allegations in the Mail hacking trial
2/12/26
Briefings