News

Royal Charter proposals are overcomplicated and undemocratic

20/12/2012

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Representatives of Hacked Off today met with Maria Miller, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and Oliver Letwin, the Minister of State for Policy, to hear their proposals for press reform following the report of the Leveson Inquiry.

The Ministers confirmed that they propose the creation of a new body under Royal Charter to assess and if appropriate, recognise a new self-regulator that is being set up by the newspaper industry. They plan two new pieces of legislation, one to underpin this chartered body and another to put in place incentives for the press to join the self-regulator.

Professor Brian Cathcart, Director of Hacked Off, said after the meeting:

"We are pleased to hear that ministers now acknowledge that legislation is necessary to ensure that a regulator is effective and truly independent of politicians and the press."

However, the proposals as outlined are not what we seek, which is the full and prompt implementation of Lord Justice Leveson's recommendations, in the open and transparent manner he proposed."

Victims of press harassment, phone hacking and other abuses want to see a permanent solution on the lines proposed by Leveson, so that others won't have to go through what they suffered."

It makes no sense for the Government to bin the carefully thought-through proposals presented by the judge, in favour of this rushed and overcomplicated response."

We urge ministers now to do as the judge recommended. Instead of engaging in elaborate political manoeuvres that rely on undemocratic royal prerogative, they should introduce a single, straightforward bill to Parliament that creates an effective recognition body and at the same time guarantees press freedom."

As Gerry McCann has said, this is the very minimum required to protect the public in the future from the kinds of abuses that made the Leveson Inquiry necessary."

Hacked Off and the Ministers will meet again in the new year.To support the victims of press abuse and their hopes that Leveson will be implemented in full, please sign our petition and encourage your friends to do the same.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News