News

Rupert Murdoch must be held to his words

17/02/2012

Brian Cathcart

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

With one mighty leap, it seems, Rupert was out. One day his London journalists were reported to be in open revolt against him and the next he had apparently pulled off one of his masterstrokes and was firmly in the driving seat again.

Murdoch has conceded very little. On the central issue, the company’s new zero tolerance of lawbreaking and its full-on cooperation with the police in purging past lawbreakers, he seems to have stood absolutely firm. “We cannot protect people who have paid public officials,” he declared.His email to staff carried no echo of Trevor Kavanagh’s wild claims of a police witch-hunt and of a disproportionate investigation. Nor did it give more than vague acknowledgement to those much-aired concerns for for the protection of journalistic sources.

He bent a little by ending the suspensions of those who have been arrested (his London management had presumably not wanted them in the building) and he promised a new Sunday paper and a new dawn of ethical popular journalism. Above all perhaps, he restated his personal commitment to the Sun.

It is all good news. It is good that he refused to back down and abandon the process of house-cleaning, good that he is staying loyal to his paper and good that he is showing leadership by mapping out a better future. And it is especially good that he personally committed himself to making his company “an example to Fleet Street of ethical journalism”. He has written those words; now he must be held to them.

Brian Cathcart, a founder of Hacked Off, teaches journalism at Kingston University London. He tweets @BrianCathcart

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News