News

Sir Harold Evans: Murdoch's takeover of Times 'seminal event' in press and politicians collusion

18/05/2012

Rupert Murdoch’s takeover of Times Newspapers was a “seminal event” in collusion between the press and politicians, the Leveson Inquiry has heard.Sir Harold Evans, editor of the Times from 1981 to 1982, was part of a management buyout group who wanted to take over the Sunday Times at the time.Evans said the takeover was relevant to the inquiry because it shows "the manifestations of the same culture of too close a connection between one powerful media group and politicians".He said no one knew Murdoch had a secret lunch in 1981 with then prime minister Margaret Thatcher and explained it was thought the bid would be referred to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC).He told Lord Justice Leveson: “My Lord, if I might say so, the seminal event was 30 years ago. [Current problems] all flowed from the excessive concentration of power in a single media corporation.”Evans, who edited the Sunday Times for 14 years, said he was “horrified” that the takeover – which he called the most important in British press history – had not been referred to the MMC by trade secretary John Biffen. Evans said journalists at the Times believed the bid would be blocked.He added: “I was told by someone I knew that Mrs Thatcher had determined [the bid] must go to Mr Murdoch because she valued his support. In this belief I was supportive of Mr Hugh Stephenson at the Times, who had it from a friend in the Cabinet Office that Mrs Thatcher’s real debt of gratitude was the crucial factor in doing this.”The former editor said his relationship with Murdoch had started well, describing him as an “electric presence”. But by 1982 Evans referred to him as "evil incarnate".He said: "He had his heart removed long ago along with moral faculties and human sensibilities”.Evans described almost coming to blows with Murdoch over economic policy, after he invited the proprietor to his house for dinner. Evans said Murdoch had gone through the business news of the paper – “gouging through” the pages with a pen – following another dinner where the editor was criticised by Murdoch’s friends.He resigned from the Times in 1982 over editorial differences with Murdoch.Evans said press regulation could include an independent ombudsman with the power to summon editors and journalists, and issue sanctions. He added the current Press Complaints Commission does “not even have the power to frighten a goose”.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News