News

News

Thurlbeck: Mosley orgy story not in public interest

12/12/2011

A former News of the World chief reporter has admitted a story about a former F1 boss' orgy was not in the public interest without a Nazi theme.Neville Thurlbeck, who worked at the NoW for 21 years, admitted during his oral evidence to the Leveson Inquiry that the story about Max Mosley's S&M ‘party’ was not in the public interest with the Nazi theme removed from it.Thurlbeck said he believed, however, that at the time there was a public interest in the story and it was the "suggestion of a Nazi theme that initially persuaded us that it was in the public interest".When asked by Inquiry counsel, Robert Jay, if he was involved in discussions about whether to confront Mosley about the story, Thurlbeck said he was not part of the process.He said he believed the editor thought "we had a perfectly legitimate story we need to run".Thurlbeck said: "We had every justification in running it and the editor feared the story could be prevented from coming out by Mosley."The former NoW chief reporter also admitted sending emails to the two anonymous women who had helped him get the video of the orgy.He was trying to get them to agree to an interview, otherwise he would publish images of them without pixellation.Thurlbeck said he was "happy to accept full responsibility for sending emails", but told Lord Justice Leveson the messages were drafted by his news editor, Ian Edmondson.Earlier today, "Fake Sheikh" Mazher Mahmood, an investigative reporter who worked at the NoW for more than 20 years, also gave evidence.He was asked about his stings and where the ethical boundaries were for reporters doing investigations into criminal behaviour.Mahmood claimed his investigations have led to 261 successful criminal prosecutions to date.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
Reporting montage
Professor Arday, IPSO, and the press: steps to end the cycle of tragedy
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg, Professor of Media Law at the University of Leeds, on why the press hounding of Professor Jason Arday will happen again unless politicians act.
8/16/26
News