News

Wallace apologises for Mirror coverage of Christopher Jefferies' case

16/01/2012

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP
A national newspaper editor has apologised to the landlord of a murder victim, over a series of defamatory articles published in his paper.

Richard Wallace, editor of the Daily Mirror, said the coverage was a "black mark on his editing record" and apologised to Chris Jefferies and his friends and family. He added: "I think Mr Jefferies' name will be imprinted on my brain forever more".

The Mirror was one of eight papers forced to pay libel damages to Jefferies over coverage of the murder of Joanna Yeates. Wallace claimed an off-the-record police source told the paper they were sure they had "got their man" when Jefferies was arrested. He said information was "at the front and centre of my thoughts" when making editorial decisions at the time, and had "greatly coloured" his judgement.

Jefferies told the inquiry that he would never "fully recover from the events of last year" and said: "The incalculable effect of what was written about me by these highly influential Tabloid newspapers is something from which it will be difficult ever to escape".

He said he was advised to change his appearance to avoid media interest, and was "effectively under house arrest".

Jefferies was arrested in December 2010 and was later cleared as a suspect. Vincent Tabak, Yeates's neighbour, was found guilty of her murder in October 2011. Wallace pointed out that Avon and Somerset police had reviewed vital CCTV footage of Yeates following an interview with a pub landlord carried out by the Mirror.

Lord Justice Leveson said he understood the "critical importance" of the press during police investigations but that the papers should take responsibility for shaping public opinion.The Mirror was also fined £50,000 for contempt of court over the coverage, and is currently appealing the decision.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News