News

INFLECTION POINT: Hacked Off analysis of media coverage of the Christchurch Attacks

01/05/2019

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Christchurch: When social media platforms became publishers of extremism and news websites became amplifiers of hatred.

READ THE REPORT HERE

Some media companies propagated footage from the Christchurch attack to, potentially, a far greater audience than those who saw the attack through Facebook. It is likely that more than a million people had access to edited footage of the terrorist’s self-recorded attack through websites of The Sun, the Mirror and the Daily Mail. The Mail even uploaded the killer’s white supremacist manifesto.

Now, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden and President of France Emmanuel Macron are organising a gathering of world leaders on May 15th, to launch the “Christchurch Call” - a pledge to fight terrorists’ use of online media to share their vile propaganda.

Hacked Off’s analysis shows that when it comes to that pledge, social media is only one part of the picture.

Newspapers, websites and other news publishers share responsibility for fighting the spread of terrorist propaganda. The decision of The Sun, Mail and Mirror to publish edited footage of the gunman’s attack was unacceptable.

READ THE REPORT HERE

Tell the Secretary of State:

Independent media regulation MUST be part of response to Christchurch Call

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News