News

Johnson evidence confirms The Times was briefed on ex-PM's Birthday party, later found to be illegal

22/03/2023

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Evidence provided to the Privileges Committee on behalf of Boris Johnson has confirmed that The Times newspaper was briefed on the illegal gathering in June 2020, which resulted in Johnson and Rishi Sunak receiving a Fixed Penalty Notice and a fine from the Metropolitan Police.

The Times, which briefly referred to the gathering in an article the following day, do not raise concerns in their article about the possibility that such a gathering would have been in breach of the rules.

The episode raises further questions about the closeness between the Government and parts of the press. The finding that the Prime Minister had acted in breach of the law represented a major scandal and would be considered a huge scoop for any investigative media outlet genuinely committed to holding the powerful to account.

Yet it was not until January 2022, 18 months later, that ITV News reported that the gathering may have been a breach of the rules.

The reporting of ITV News and other investigative outlets ultimately led to the police investigations which resulted in Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak’s fines.

The Times reported the event the following day, as “a small gathering in the cabinet room” for the former PM’s Birthday.

The newspaper added, “Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, and a group of aides sang him Happy Birthday before they tucked into a Union Jack cake.”

At the time, the law stated that gatherings of two or more people were prohibited, unless individuals were in the same household, working (and their gathering was essential for their work), at a funeral, caring for someone, moving home, providing emergency assistance, or were legally required to be present.

The Times had otherwise reported heavily on the lockdown restrictions yet did not raise any questions or doubts about the legality of Johnson’s Birthday party in its coverage of the event.

The Times was among the newspapers which campaigned for the cancellation of Leveson Part Two in 2018, the public inquiry which would have investigated allegations of corrupt relationships between politicians and the press.

Fellow News UK title, The Sun, was previously accused of assisting in a cover-up of the rule-breaking parties in 10 Downing Street, when it was discovered that the newspaper’s Deputy Editor had been present at some of the parties – including one in his honour – in his previous employment as the Downing Street Director of Communications.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News