News

Juror discharged with stress; remaining jurors continue deliberating tomorrow

21/01/2015

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The deadlocked jury at The Sun corruption trial in Kingston will resume deliberations for the ninth day tomorrow after the late discharge of a highly-stressed juror.

A juror who has heard every day of the case for four months passed the judge a note this afternoon stating he was feeling ill and wished to be removed from the divided deliberations. The juror was then discharged by Judge Richard Marks QC and left the court on his own.

Mr Justice Marks called the remaining 11 jurors – who have been deadlocked on nine counts for a fortnight – back into court and told them that the juror had been discharged because he was "under a good deal of pressure and stress".

Having been previously appraised of the voting intentions of the jury, the judge then asked the remaining 11 jurors whether there was a realistic prospect they would ever reach a verdict.

After considering the question briefly in their jury room, at 4.33pm the jury returned to court and the foreman said "We've decided that we would like to come back tomorrow given the changed dynamic with one of our number being discharged. We believe the deliberations won't take a long time but we just want to check we are all comfortable on where we are." They will continue their deliberations at 9.45am tomorrow.

The juror's illness came at the end of a dramatic day in Court 9 at Kingston Crown Court, with the four remaining defendants – Chris Pharo, Ben O'Driscoll, Graham Dudman and Jamie Pyatt – repeatedly called back into court to hear the latest developments.

The jury had cleared The Sun's picture editor John Edwards and the paper's former East Anglia reporter John Troup of all charges on Friday, and The Sun's development director Graham Dudman and its former deputy news editor Ben O'Driscoll of one count each.

However, the foreman told the judge in a note that they could not reach verdicts on the other counts and gave their voting figures on each count. These have not been disclosed.

After a two day absence on Monday and Tuesday this week caused by the illness of a different juror, the judge told the deadlocked jurors at 10am today that he could accept majority verdicts.

However shortly before 3pm the jury foreman again said he and his peers could not agree whether any of the remaining four defendants were guilty or not guilty.

All deny conspiring to commit misconduct in public office over payments to police and other public officials.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News