News

Jury at Sun corruption payments trial told by defence that silencing journalists is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes like Russia, Egypt and China

04/03/2015

A defence barrister at an ongoing corruption trial involving senior staff from the Sun has told an Old Bailey jury that former editor Rebekah Brooks has been "removed from the narrative."

Vincent Coghlan QC, who is representing the newspaper’s executive editor Fergus Shanahan against charges relating to alleged payments to a Ministry of Defence civil servant said "If the editor was happy to pay for these stories it would be a brave deputy who refused,” adding that "if editorial approval was sought from anyone, it would be Rebekah Brooks." The jury was then reminded of an 2008 email from the then editor, Brooks, who asked for paperwork for confidential cash payments not to be sent to her any longer "otherwise I will be signing all day."

The remarks came during closing argument at the trial of Shanahan, Sun Royal correspondent Duncan Larcombe, deputy editor Geoffrey Webster, former chief reporter John Kay, ex-soldier John Hardy and his wife Claire, all of whom are facing charges relating to misconduct in a public office. The barrister also said that some people wanted a "post-Leveson journalism," of “government-approved news" and showed a newspaper mock-up to the jury with the headline "two ancient emails of slight interest to Old Bailey trial," as an example of what that would look like.

Earlier Trevor Burke QC, who is defending John Kay, told the jury that News International, had "surrendered" the journalist's civil service source to the police "without a fight," but had also "quietly arranged for a lawyer to attend the police station were he was taken after his arrest."

The QC said that Kay was on trial for "simply doing his job," and spoke of the "disturbing development that journalists who report the news accurately and fearlessly end up in the criminal courts." Burke said silencing journalists is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes, citing Russia, Egypt and China and told the jury that "the long hand of the establishment cannot reach into your room and tell you what to do."

John Kay, Burke continued, saw his role "to hold the powerful to account and speak for those who have no voice, he only reported the truth." Kay, the prosecution allege, arranged for a civil servant, Bettina Jordan-Barber to be paid £100,000 for confidential information about military matters, including details of casualties in Afghanistan and army sex scandals.

The 11 remaining members of the jury are expected to retire early next week to consider their verdicts. All of the defendants deny all of the charges.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News