News

Jury at The Sun corruption trial was discharged today after failing to reach verdicts

22/01/2015

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The jury at The Sun corruption trial at Kingston Crown Court was today discharged after failing to reach verdicts on most of the 14 counts.

The Crown confirmed it will seek a retrial of charges against four current and past Sun journalists on charges related to payments to police officers and other public officials. A retrial is expected to take place at the Old Bailey within the next few months.

The Sun's head of news, Chris Pharo, Graham Dudman, its development director, Jamie Pyatt, a district reporter, and Ben O'Driscoll, a former deputy news editor, had been on trial for four months accused of conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office.

Sun picture editor John Edwards and ex-reporter John Troup, who had been in the dock alongside them, were acquitted by the jury on Friday. But at 12.15pm today the foreman confirmed he and his peers could not reach any verdicts on the remaining nine counts. The jury had been in retirement for 49 hours over eight days.

A male juror suffering from stress was discharged from the case yesterday, leading the jury foreman to ask for more time today to consider the evidence. But two hours deliberation today failed to break the deadlock and all parties were called back into court to hear the news.

Asked by the court clerk whether the jury had reached any verdicts, the foreman replied only "No". Responding to the hung jury, Oliver Glasgow, for the Crown, told the judge "In the circumstances, the Crown seeks a retrial".

Judge Richard Marks QC thanked the remaining 11 jurors for their efforts and excused them from doing jury service for the next 10 years. He said that they probably expected to spend two weeks trying a "relatively ordinary and mundane case", adding "But it's turned out very differently".

The judge thanked counsel in the case, saying it had been "the best possible advertisement for the English legal system and the English bar".

Turning to the defendants, he said "I recognise it's an unfortunate ending from their point of view."

A hearing to discuss a retrial is due to take place the Old Bailey on Friday 6 February.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News