News

The Mail on Sunday and Danielle Hindley: proof that nothing has changed.

24/02/2020

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Written by Brian Cathcart ‍

At the Royal Courts of Justice in London tomorrow the owners of the Mail on Sunday will formally admit that the paper published an article featuring unfounded allegations that wrecked the life of a working single mother from Leeds. They will also apologise and pay her damages.

The treatment dished out to Danielle Hindley proves nothing has changed since before the Leveson Inquiry, when, as the judge put it, newspapers went around ‘wreaking havoc in the lives of innocent people’. Hindley did nothing wrong and though she told the Mail on Sunday the allegations against her were unfounded, the paper published anyway.

It’s also a humiliation for the complaints body IPSO, which the press and the government falsely claim is an effective regulator. Though Hindley took her case to IPSO and it upheld her complaint in 2018, it then did its best to let the Mail on Sunday off the hook. Only after this disappointment did she decide to sue.

Hindley, who operates a small beauty business from her home on the outskirts of Leeds, was all but ruined when the Mail on Sunday called her a ‘cosmetic cowboy’ in 2017 and published an unfounded allegation that she botched a treatment. She was driven to the brink of suicide, while her young son’s health and well-being were destroyed.

The Mail on Sunday and its owners, Associated Newspapers, admitted they knew ‘the high level of distress and anxiety’ she was suffering but they still dragged out the legal process by insisting for as long as possible they would fight the case.

‍Though they have now admitted defeat and paid damages, they have inflicted wholly unjustified harm on an innocent person, and for them the cost of settling is pocket money. There is nothing to stop them doing the same to another blameless person tomorrow.

‍Tomorrow should be a shaming day for the Mail on Sunday, which was edited at the time by Geordie Greig, now in charge of the Daily Mail, which is owned by Lord Rothermere, and for their legal teams. The reporter whose name appeared on the article was Charlotte Wace.

Updated on 9/02/26

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News