News

Fresh evidence of Mail on Sunday complicity in criminal conduct emerges months after Government cancel public inquiry protested by ex-editor-in-chief Paul Dacre

07/01/2019

Hacked Off

Reports have emerged this week which show email evidence that former Mail on Sunday senior editor Chris Anderson received material which allegedly included voicemail transcripts from the phone of the nanny who worked for Sadie Frost and Jude Law.

The Mail Group have always denied that phone hacking occurred at their titles.

Commenting on the revelations, Hacked Off Director of Policy Nathan Sparkes said,

“The email exchanges between a convicted phone hacker and a senior Mail on Sunday editor which have been uncovered this week are an embarrassment for the Government, who claimed that there was nothing more to investigate when it cut short the Leveson Inquiry into these matters last year. There cannot be any further delay – the Inquiry must be re-established to finish its work.”

Paul Dacre, who was editor-in-chief of the Mail Group newspapers at the time, has had private un-minuted meetings with the Prime Minister over the past two years, including a dinner at 10 Downing Street in the run up to the cancellation of Leveson Part Two - a decision which was opposed by the public in opinion polling, and by the majority of total respondents to the Government’s own consultation.

Leader of the Liberal Democrats Vince Cable MP said:

“In suppressing the second half of the Leveson Inquiry, Conservative Ministers rejected the calls of the National Union of Journalists, free speech campaigns, the general public and the victims of press abuse. They are assenting to the wishes of Theresa May’s dining companion and Mail Group editor-in-chief, Paul Dacre. “The Government must release the minutes of the Prime Minister’s private meetings with Paul Dacre immediately, as recommended by Leveson, to exclude the possibility of corruption.“Without further reassurances from the Government and publication of the minutes of the Prime Minister’s meetings with Mr Dacre, members of the public and MPs will find it difficult to understand how the decision to cancel Part Two could have been reached in good conscience”.

Ends

For press enquiries contact: sara@hackinginquiry.org and 07554 665 940

Notes

Transparency data forms the basis of this report:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/604116/PM_returns_Oct_-_Dec_2016_Hospitality.csv/previewTransparency data showing un-minuted dinner, September 10th 2018:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/766215/2018-12-12_PM_HOSPITALITY_Quarterly_Transparency_Return_Jul_-_Sept_-_PUBLICATION.csv/preview

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News