News

Making up expenses claims "was a completely common practice" The Sun's former managing editor tells court

02/12/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

The Sun's former managing editor made up his expenses, he told the paper's corruption trial today.

Graham Dudman said that when he claimed on his expenses for meals with police contacts he was actually having Chinese takeaways or curries with his family at his home town of Brentwood in Essex.

He is charged with conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office by allegedly making payments to an unidentified police officer for information about the investigation into the Soham murders in 2002.

Mr Dudman, 51, is also accused of two other counts of conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office relating to cash payments by reporters for stories about Broadmoor and Whitemoor prison.

Now The Sun's Editorial Development Director, Mr Dudman told Kingston Crown Court he did have a source of information for the Soham investigation into the murders of two children, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman.

But he said he would not reveal his informant's identity because of his journalistic duty to protect his sources.

He agreed with his lawyer, Oliver Blunt QC, that the name of the Soham informant for whom he had claimed cash payments of £750 and £500 was a false name.

He said that when he claimed to be meeting police or other contacts at four meals between September and November 2002 he had actually been buying meals for his family at either the Shenfield Tandoori or Imperial Peking in Brentwood.

Asked whether he had entertained sources at the meals in September, Mr Dudman replied: "No they were takeaway meals for my family." He also agreed he had claimed Sun expenses for sources for a Sunday afternoon meal with his family at Nando's at Bluewater shopping centre.

Mr Blunt said: "You've told us they were takeaways meals for the family etc. Was there anything you saw that was out of kilter relating to making expense claims for your family?"

Mr Dudman told the court: "No, it was a completely common practice – something that I was taught to do when I arrived on Fleet Street. I had done it for years, many many reporters did exactly the same." The executive added: "And when I became managing editor and saw expenses, it was absolutely abundantly clear to me that this was a practice across The Sun."

He said that as managing editor he paid "very little" attention to expenses claims for a series of stories about Broadmoor hospital from Jamie Pyatt, the Sun's Thames Valley reporter. However, he agreed that he had challenged Mr Pyatt why he needed cash for the Broadmoor stories – and that he had sent a similar email to another reporter, John Troup, about a story on HMP Whitemoor.

Mr Dudman, who had earlier said he had a concern about reporters pocketing cash, said: "I'm checking these payments were for journalism..."This was a cash culture. There was lots of cash around. I just wanted to make sure it was [claimed] for the right reasons."

Mr Dudman agreed that in his email to Mr Pyatt he had asked for reassurance about the cash payments "for my own safety." Mr Dudman explained: "Ultimately I release the cash and I suppose if there is ever an issue with where the cash has gone... had it not been spent on journalism, I would have had questions asked of me."

However Mr Dudman said that he had been satisfied about the payments [which were made], saying "they were all good stories... and I would have said: 'OK, fine'."He said police and prison stories listed on the counts he faced had been in the public interest.

He, Mr Pyatt, Mr Troup, Sun picture editor John Edwards, news editor Chris Pharo and former deputy news editor Ben O'Driscoll deny conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News