News

Nobody at The Sun queried payments being made to public officials, Sun reporter tells court

24/11/2014

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Nobody at The Sun queried payments being made to public officials, a Sun reporter, Jamie Pyatt, told a court today.

Cross-examined at The Sun corruption trial, Mr Pyatt agreed that it was common knowledge inside Britain's biggest newspaper that it handed cash to public officials in return for supplying information.

No executive had ever upbraided him for making the payments, Mr Pyatt said.

He and five other past and present journalists at The Sun are on trial at Kingston Crown Court accused of conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office.

Under cross-examination from Peter Wright QC, for the Crown, Mr Pyatt agreed that he told executives that the money was going to police officers, Army contacts and Broadmoor psychiatric hospital contacts.

Mr Wright asked: "Did anybody at The Sun ever ring you up asking what are you doing asking for a payment for a public official?"

Mr Pyatt said it was well known the paper paid cash for stories.

Mr Wright pressed: "But did anybody point out to you that we don't pay public officials cash for stories?"

The reporter replied: "No.""And it was common knowledge among the journalists?" asked the prosecutor.

Mr Pyatt – the Thames Valley reporter – told the court: "We all knew that public officials were being paid; I accept that.""I made no attempt to hide it. I thought it was OK if they [the public official] had approached the paper. And yes, I fully accept they were paid."

Mr Wright asked: "It was condoned by others, wasn't it?

The reporter, who worked out of an office in his home in Windsor, said he wasn't in the Sun offices in Wapping, London.

Mr Wright again pressed: "Nobody ever told you: You can't do this"?

Mr Pyatt replied: "No....They knew exactly who they were dealing with."

He agreed with the prosecutor that The Sun's news editor, Chris Pharo, and deputy news editor, Ben O'Driscoll, never refused to make any of the cash payments he requested, though sometimes they lowered the amounts.

Last week Mr Pharo told the court that he tended to agree to the payments requested by his journalists because he did not want to fall out with his reporters, and preferred to take "the line of least resistance."

Asked whether Mr Pharo was a strong character, Mr Pyatt replied: "Quite a strong personality."

Intervening, Judge Richard Marks asked: "His decision was final?", to which Mr Pyatt replied: “Yes."

Mr Wright went on: "He [Mr Pharo] didn't get to where he has at The Sun by just agreeing to everything that his journalists put to him?"

Mr Pyatt said that his boss' talent had been responsible for him rising through the rank of the paper.

The prosecutor asked: "Over these many years of your dealing with Mr Pharo did you get the impression he was a man who preferred the line of least resistance?", to which Mr Pharo replied: "Not in his dealings with me."

He said the issue of paying public officials had not come up with Rebekah Brooks, or with any other editor, adding: "They were too far up the level for me."

Mr Wright suggested paying police officers and others was simply not an issue, saying: "It was common knowledge wasn't it, that The Sun would pay public officials for information?"

Mr Pyatt told the court: "If the story was true and judged to be in the public interest then yes, we would pay."

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News