News

Opinion: The Sun’s hypocrisy over lockdown breaches

12/07/2023

Alice Watkins

by Alice WatkinsThis morning the Sun newspaper led with: ‘BBC presenter suspended over sex claims ‘broke Covid law’ to meet young stranger from a dating site.’

This appears to be an attempt to present a greater public interest justification for the newspaper’s recent coverage on the conduct of an unnamed BBC presenter, after Hacked Off and others called for The Sun to answer questions about its journalistic practices in pursuit of the story.

But apart from anything else, The Sun’s coverage today highlights the hypocrisy of the paper.

Last year we reported that the Deputy Editor of The Sun attended a lockdown party held, in his honour, by No 10 after it was announced he would be leaving Downing Street to take up his new position with the newspaper. Did The Sun report on it at the time, with a front page splash? It certainly did not.

Then there are the series of meetings between the Government and newspaper editors which occurred on the same dates that lockdown parties are alleged to have taken place, including a party in November 2020, which was even addressed by the Prime Minister himself.

We still don’t know everything that happened at those lockdown parties - including the question of whether Sun journalists or editors knew about them, and failed to report on those too.

Regardless of the merits of The Sun’s reporting on this alleged lockdown breach today, it is yet another example of hypocrisy from the paper.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News