News

Paying Broadmoor worker for story about patients Halloween party was worthwhile, former Sun executive tells court

27/11/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Paying an NHS worker at Broadmoor for a story about patients staging a Halloween party was worthwhile, a former Sun executive told a court today.

Ben O’Driscoll said that the story – headlined Sick or Treat – was “important” and prompted the psychiatric hospital to change its policy on such parties.

Giving evidence at the Sun corruption trial, Mr O’Driscoll agreed with prosecutor Oliver Glasgow that a Broadmoor insider had obviously supplied the story, for which reporter Jamie Pyatt secured £1,000 cash for his source.

Mr Glasgow asked: “A staff member?”, to which Mr O’Driscoll, former deputy news editor of the Sun, replied: "That's right.”

The executive said the money could have gone to “Tipster Bob,” who had phoned the paper’s Wapping headquarters offering to supply information about the serial killer Robert Knapper.

Kingston Crown Court was told that Mr O’Driscoll had passed the details of “Tipster Bob” onto Mr Pyatt, the Thames Valley reporter whose patch covered Broadmoor.

Mr Pyatt has agreed that he subsequently paid Broadmoor healthcare assistant Robert Neave cash for information about what happened inside the hospital.

While asking the newsdesk for money for the Halloween story, Mr Pyatt said of his source: "This guy is just getting better and better."

Referring to the Halloween party story, Mr O’Driscoll, now the Daily Mail’s deputy news editor, told the court: "It's better that Robert Neave receives the money in that way, than the story does not come out.

“Broadmoor had to change its policy in the way they dealt with patients as a result of that story."

Mr Glasgow pressed him: "You don't see a problem with a national newspaper paying cash to public officers, so that they can disclose information to that newspaper?”

Mr O’Driscoll replied: "You have to be very careful about this. This was a nurse at Broadmoor who was disclosing how that hospital was run and the issues with that hospital. It was very important.

“If you add up all the money he received over a number of years, it wasn't a great deal."

When the prosecutor pointed out that Mr Neave had received approximately £9,000 from the Sun in total, Mr O’Driscoll said: "I would far prefer it if Mr Neave had remained as he had been at the beginning - a whistleblower."

He, Mr Pyatt and four other past and present Sun journalists deny conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News