News

Phone hacking trial jury retire to consider their verdicts

11/06/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

After eight months sitting silently in a court at the Old Bailey the jury at the phone hacking trial retired to consider their verdicts for the time time this afternoon.

Shortly after the judge, Mr Justice Saunders, finished five days of summing up, the eight female and three male jurors began their deliberations at 3.33pm.

They returned to Court 12 of London's Central Criminal Court at 4.52pm, when they were sent home for the night, with a warning that they must not discuss the case with each other after leaving the building.

Addressing them shortly before they retired, Mr Justice Saunders told them: "You are under no pressure of time and you must take the time you need to reach your verdicts."

He told the jury they could if they wishes sit until 6pm Monday to Thursday, adding that he would send them home by no later than 4.30pm on Fridays."

What you have to do is to act according to your view," Mr Justice Saunders told them."

You have to reach a true verdict according to the evidence you have heard in court - and only that evidence."

He said the 11 should discuss the evidence only when they were all present - and not separately in "cabals."

The judge said the jurors should ask him if they needed to review any particular piece of evidence.

He urged them to resist the temptation to look up anything about the case on the internet. Concluding his remarks, he told the jury - who have attended the case promptly during throughout the eight months of evidence: "It's been a privilege to work with you all."

The seven defendants in the case are Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson, Stuart Kuttner, Clive Goodman, Cheryl Carter, Charlie Brooks and Mark Hanna.

They are charged variously with one or several of the following charges of conspiracies to hack phones, commit misconduct in a public office and pervert the course of justice.

They deny all charges.

The jury will return to Court 12 at 10am tomorrow to continue their deliberations.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News