News

News

Police evidence of more than 6,000 NOTW "hacking calls", trial hears

04/02/2014

By Martin HickmanNews International staff or contractors made more than 6,000 calls to voicemail inboxes before police smashed the phone hacking operation at the News of the World, the phone hacking trial heard today.In a two-year period leading up to the arrests of NoW reporter Clive Goodman and the private detective Glenn Mulcaire in August 2006, they and journalists at News International made 6,813 calls to 281 unique voicemail numbers, or UVNs.Calls to UVNs have been described at the Old Bailey as "hacking calls" - attempted or successful interceptions of mobile phone messages.A phone data specialist at the Met's hacking inquiry, Operation Weeting, Detective Constable Steven Fitzgerald, disclosed the data to the trial.He explained the police had call data for four types of phone; News International's ordinary hub system; NI's 'private wire' [a Vodafone mobile number shared by several staff]; landlines at Mulcaire's office in south London; and the landline at Goodman's home in south London.He said the billing information for News International's hub between July 2004 and August 2006 was supplied to the Met by News International, while the 'private wire' for October 2005 to August 2006 came from News Corp's Management and Standards Committee.Det Const Fitzgerald told the court there were a total of 4,714 calls from NI's hub and 'private wire', to 135 voicemail inboxes.Police were able to recover call data for Mulcaire's landlines covering February and April 2005 and December 2005 and August 2006. There were 1,450 calls to 132 UVNs, Det Const Fitzgerald saidFor Goodman's home between January 2005 and August 2006, there were 649 calls to 14 voicemail numbers.Detective Constable Fitzgerald said that the police had only been able to track calls to UVNs they knew, meaning that there was "every possibility" that the number of calls to voicemails was higher.Addressing the jury, Judge John Saunders told the jury that the prosecution case would end tomorrow. He added that the current timetable suggested that at the latest (the "worst case scenario”) they would retire to consider their verdicts in mid-May.He told them that them it was important they continued to approach their task diligently, saying: "It's an important case for the defendants, for the public, for everybody."All the defendants deny the charges, which include conspiring to hack voicemails and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The case continues.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
Reporting montage
Professor Arday, IPSO, and the press: steps to end the cycle of tragedy
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg, Professor of Media Law at the University of Leeds, on why the press hounding of Professor Jason Arday will happen again unless politicians act.
8/16/26
News