News

Prosecution: 15 million NI emails are missing

27/11/2013

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

DAY 23 - Wed 27 NovBy Martin HickmanFifteen million emails from Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper group have been lost to police and other investigators, the hacking trial heard today.

Prosecutor Mark Bryant-Heron explained that the records were wiped during technical changes before a fresh police investigation into phone hacking began in January 2011.

Prior to January 2005, he told the jury, there had been no archiving of emails by News International, owner of The Sun and the News of the World, meaning that they were lost forever unless they had been saved by a journalist or other employee.

After January 2005, he said, emails would be archived after 14 days, unless they had already been deleted by a user or users.

Mr Bryant-Heron said that there had been a mass “purging” or deletion of millions of emails shortly before the News of the World moved into new offices in Thomas More Square, London, in late 2010.

In August 2010, some 10,363,589 emails dating back to December 2007 were “purged or deleted”. On 20 September 2010, a further 4,480,902 emails were purged or deleted.

During 2010, Rebekah Brooks, then chief executive, responding to a deletion policy set out by the company’s IT executives, approved of removing everything before January 2010. “Yes to January 2010,” she wrote in an email read out to the court. “Clean sweep.”

Later, in January 2011, the court heard, News International called in an outside contractor, Essential Computing, to “extract” the emails of 105 individuals from the system. The court was told they had been converted to “PST” files.

At the conclusion of the prosecution’s statement, Judge John Saunders told the jury not to worry if they had not understood the technical information, since it would be explained later in the trial. “It is difficult to follow,” he said of the email deletion evidence.

Mrs Brooks and seven other defendants have pleaded not guilty to all charges. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News