News

Reporter guilty of "naked act of corruption" court hears

08/01/2015

Hacked Off

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

A Sun journalist paid an army officer for information on the Royal Princes a jury was told today. Opening their case at the Old Bailey the prosecution at the trial of four Sun journalists, Army officer John Hardy and his wife Claire alleged that the paper's Royal editor, Duncan Larcombe, sought to arrange 34 payments to the Sandhurst based soldier for information about Prince Harry and Prince William during their officer training. Some of these payments, the Crown alleges, were authorised by Larcomber’s fellow defendant the Sun’s then Deputy Editor Geoff Webster.

Barrister Michael Parroy QC told the court that: "It is the prosecution case that paying a serving officer for confidential material is a naked act of corruption and Geoffrey Webster knew precisely that. Yet he was prepared to sanction it in the pursuit of an amusing and salacious story." The prosecutor also told the court that Hardy also assisted The Sun to obtain a picture of Prince William in a bikini dressed as a "Bond girl" at a fancy dress party though.

Hardy, who retired from the army in 2012, is on trial alongside his wife Claire who is alleged to have received payments from The Sun into her bank account in full knowledge that they were for confidential information. The prosecution also say that the former officer was paid £250 to go to a strip club to "spy" on other Sandhurst staff which led to an article in the newspaper entitled: “Stripocrisy of Harry Bosses".

All of the defendants deny all of the charges, the trial continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News