News

Security boss guarding Rebekah Brooks refers to ‘pizzagate’, trial hears

14/01/2014

Martin Hickman

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

A security boss contracted by News International to guard Rebekah Brooks described an alleged plot to hide evidence from police as "pizzagate," the hacking trial heard today.

William Geddes, managing director of International Corporate Protection, asked colleague Dave Johnson: "Can you talk ref Pizzagate?"

Mr Geddes sent the message on Monday 18 July after police were called to Mrs Brooks's flat complex following the discovery of a laptop bag in its basement car park.

A security guard working for News International had delivered some pizzas to Mrs Brooks's husband Charlie at Chelsea Harbour as cover for returning the laptop bag, according to the Crown.

Asked by judge John Saunders to explain the reference to Pizzagate, Mr Geddes said: "Pizzagate was the term the team came up with for the fact that the errand they ran included not only returning a bag, but a pizza, so that's what they called it."

He explained that many of the security guards protecting Mrs Brooks were ex-military who used "lingo."

Asked again by the judge to clarify Pizzagate, Mr Geddes went on: "My interpretation would be in the spirit of the general lingo used by my team members this was blowing an inconvenient situation into a bit of a drama."

Mr Geddes explained that his company was contracted by NI's security chief Mark Hanna in April 2011 to protect the chief executive, Mrs Brooks. ICP was contracted again in June 2011, when Mr Geddes subcontracted part of the job to another security firm, Corunna Solutions.

Mr Geddes told the court: "Our duties were to perform a discreet security coverage and to identify any surveillance against her [Mrs Brooks] that might be carried out by members of the media or hostile members of the public."

He said the risk assessment suggested there might be an internal threat from "rogue elements" within News International, but did not elaborate.

Mrs Brooks, Mr Brooks and Mr Hanna deny conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The case continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News