News

Petition: 'Ensure all the press is regulated by a Press Recognition Panel approved body'

10/03/25

Christopher Whitmey, Hacked Off supporter and press standards campaigner

Hacked Off’s newly-released documentary, Britain’s Press: Power Without Responsibility? underlines, yet again, that the main British press has no independent regulator that can investigate complaints about what it has published. Only the very rich can afford to seek a remedy through the courts. The previous Government claimed that Leveson’s incentive for newspapers to join an independent regulator would have ruined them financially. As the News Item of 28th November 2024 on Hacked Off’s website sets out, the Government had no such evidence.

Hacked Off and the Press Justice Project helped in drafting my Government petition: ‘Ensure all the press is regulated by a Press Recognition Panel approved body. We think this would provide justice for victims of lies or intrusion by newspapers, and deliver a trustworthy and accountable press that the British people deserve. The press could help create new approved bodies if needed.’

You can see it here:

‍https-petition.parliament.uk-petitions-700061‍

Thank you to those who have already signed the petition. If you haven’t yet signed please will you as soon as possible?

It would be much appreciated if you could forward these details to your friends and family, so that they can sign too.

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News