News

Soldier's death story a "belting exclusive splash" court hears

08/01/2015

A jury at the Old Bailey has been shown emails in which a Sun journalist describes a leaked story about the death of an army major in Afghanistan as a "belting exclusive splash".Prosecutor Michel Parroy QC told the court that the language used by senior reporter John Kay, in an email request for payment to the then editor Rebekah Brooks "Speaks volumes as to the interest and motivation that was at play here." Brooks replied to the request for £3000 for the civil service source with: "brilliant scoop... of course on payments”.Parroy was speaking at the opening of the trial of four Sun journalists, an army officer and his wife who are accused of conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office, involving the alleged payments to employees for information they held in confidence as a result of their public office. Bettina Jordan-Barber, a senior ministry of defence civil servant was paid £100,000 for this and other military stories printed in the best-selling tabloid.The prosecution barrister said that in his opinion, with a few exceptions, instead of a "public interest”, the interest that was being fed by the stories was simply "prurient, morbid or banal." Highlighting headlines such as: “Mucky Major and his Swinging Missus”, “The Lust Post Sandhurst Sex Scandal”, and “Prince Harry’s blisters”.A more serious story, when The Sun reported that one of the four soldiers killed in a roadside explosion in Iraq was a friend of Prince William’s from Sandhurst led to "the family of the officer involved, Joanna Dyer, to endure intense media scrutiny and intrusion at a time of very obvious and considerable personal distress." Jordan-Barber was paid £2000 for supplying the information.Parroy also highlighted a 2006 article in which The Sun dubbed an army instructor "vile," and "the abusive beast of the Sandhurst parade ground." In fact, the prosecutor told the court, that despite a complaint having been made against a full enquiry "exonerated him."The case, which is being heard before the same judge, Mr Justice Saunders, who presided over the phone-hacking trial is expected to last 8 weeks.All of the defendants deny all of the charges.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News