News

Sun reporter tells court he was following instructions of News International's most senior lawyer when he transcribed contents of MP's stolen phone

25/11/2014

Newspaper
✕ Press claim

✓ The truth

Reach
Up to
people misled
Help us fight back

Join 71,384 others who are taking action to share the truth & raise standards in the press

1. Share the truth
Post this rebuttal on social media
2. Fund the fightback
Help us challenge more stories like this
Donate
3. Tell your MP
Send a ready-written email in 30 seconds
Email your MP

Paying police was "within the rules of journalism" a senior Sun reporter testified today.

Nick Parker, who is on trial at London's Old Bailey, made the comment while under cross-examination over charges which include paying a police officer for confidential information about an alleged assault by Rolling Stones guitarist Ronnie Wood. The journalist confirmed that the policeman had supplied the address of two witnesses to the incident but told the jury: "I felt perfectly entitled to talk to a police officer as I was covered by the PCC code."

Parker also defended his description of newspaper readers in one email as "plebs" saying this was a colloquial term used internally by reporters, adding: "it's the sun newspaper not the church times." He told the court that he felt the payments to the officer were justified as he was getting no information from the Surrey police press office saying: "if the story is in the public interest I have a degree of protection, my job as a journalist is to get the story."

The reporter is also facing charges in connection with the theft of the mobile phone of Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh. Parker agreed today he had signed a contract offering £10,000 to co-defendant Michael Ankers if it contained any information that would lead to a front page story.

In a tense exchange with prosecution barrister Michael Porroy QC Parker admitted spending six hours transcribing the contents of the MP's phone but told the court: "Its my job to take all of the information I get from a source and send it to the news-desk, I write it down and let them decide." Responding to a suggestion by Porroy that he was claiming to be a: "powerless, knowledgeless dummy" the journalist replied: "I'm was just the messenger, you are making me responsible for something, it was not my decision."

Parker also claimed he had consulted with his companies head of legal affairs Tom Crone throughout the incident telling the jury: "I was following the instruction of most senior lawyer at News International. He made the decisions but is not in court today." The reporter went on: "It's run by the lawyers, it's run by the senior management, it's nothing to do with me."

Also on trial are Lee Brockhouse, a prison officer at HMP Swaleside, and Michael Ankers. All three defendants deny all of the charges, the trial continues.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News
When media abuse of academics becomes the norm in HE
Following the death of Jason Arday, Corinne Fowler writes on the toll of media abuse on academics and what universities must do to protect their staff.
8/19/26
News
IPSO ties itself in knots over Telegraph complaint
Media lawyer Jonathan Coad complained to IPSO about a Telegraph article claiming Hacked Off wants "state control" of the press. IPSO's response contradicted itself within the space of a few paragraphs.
8/14/26
News